Interviews
“Competitive Eating”
Level
High-intermediate
Pre-Listening Activities
1. Discussion Questions:
- Before listening to the interview, engage the students in a brief discussion about competitive eating. Ask questions like:
- Have you ever heard of competitive eating?
- Do you consider it a sport? Why or why not?
- What criteria do you think define a competitive sport?
- Is prize money an essential element of a sport?
Agree or Disagree? Let’s Spark Some Conversation!
These statements are designed to get everyone thinking, moving, and talking! The goal is to explore ideas, share opinions, and get ready for the next part of the lesson.
-
In a face-to-face classroom: Read each statement aloud. If you agree, move to one side of the room; if you disagree, move to the other. Talk with your group—why do you feel that way? Then, pair students with members of the other group and have students explain their reasons. Rotate partners for more practice.
-
In an online classroom: Use polls, emojis, or the chat box in your online platform to show your opinion. Then, join the conversation as a group or in breakout rooms. What do others think? Do you agree or disagree with them?
-
For independent learners: Read each statement and think about your opinion. Then say your answer out loud and explain your reason, as if you’re talking to a classmate. This helps you get ready to speak and join real conversations in English. Consider recording your ideas and self-assess your progress.
- It’s unhealthy to eat large amounts of food in a short time.
- Competitive eating promotes food waste.
- People have the right to choose extreme eating contests if they want.
- Watching eating contests is entertaining.
- Events like hot dog eating contests are bad examples for children.
- Competitive eaters deserve prize money like athletes in other sports.
- There should be more rules to protect the health of competitive eaters.
- Some eating contests show cultural traditions in a fun way.
- Eating contests seem strange or inappropriate in places with food shortages.
Vocabulary and Expressions
Here are some words and expressions that appear in the video:
stigma (noun):
- Definition: A mark of disgrace or shame associated with a particular circumstance, quality, or person.
- Sample Sentence: Despite being a skilled competitive eater, Jake faces the stigma of people doubting the legitimacy of his sport.
regimen (noun):
- Definition: A systematic plan or regular course of action, often related to training or exercise.
- Sample Sentence: Competitive eaters follow a strict regimen, including specialized diets and stomach exercises, to enhance their performance.
endurance (noun):
- Definition: The ability to withstand hardship or adversity; in the context of sports, the ability to sustain prolonged effort or activity.
- Sample Sentence: Competitive eating requires not only the capacity to consume large quantities but also considerable endurance to endure the lengthy contests.
controversial (adjective):
- Definition: Causing disagreement, dispute, or argument; often related to differing opinions on a particular subject.
- Sample Sentence: The status of competitive eating as a sport remains controversial, with people having varying perspectives on its legitimacy.
Listening Comprehension Questions
Now, watch the interview and answer the comprehension questions. You can also turn on the automatically-generated captions for the video once you start it.
Transcript
Randall: Hello, Emily. And in this video, I want to talk about something that might be a little bit controversial, right? Competitive eating like someone trying to eat as many hot dogs as they can in ten minutes. Do you think that is a competitive sport? Why or why not?
Emily: I don’t really know how I feel about this.
Randall: I mean, like, soccer is a competitive sport. Tennis is a competitive sport. Why not competitive eating?
Emily: I feel like there’s probably, it’s based on a lot of stigma. I feel like that’s something I would have to sit down and maybe evaluate. Is there a lot of training involved? My first inclination would be, no, it’s not a sport. But then if you think about it, they do have to have some sort of regiment, like, I couldn’t eat more than a hot dog, but some people can down them and I don’t know enough about it.
Randall: All right. So when you think about I think about there’s probably some training involved, like exercising your stomach muscles. Uh, probably endurance. I mean, after 3 or 4 hot dogs, I’m ready to, you know, throw up. I, I can’t eat that many. But, I mean, some of these people eat 40, 50, 60 hot dogs. So training endurance what? Any other thoughts on that?
Emily: I feel like I just need to know more about it.
Randall: So you’re not canceling it out. You’re saying, I’d like to look into this a little bit more
Emily: Yeah.
Randall: as a sport.
Emily: Yeah. Before I stand in either camp.
Randall: Alright. Well, thank you. Emily, I, I know that this is a topic that a lot of people discuss. I mean, they win prize money. Is prize money an element of competitive sport, maybe competition, maybe you have opponents. Okay. So I think there are a variety of factors. But yes, I think there’s going to be a lot of discussion on whether it is a sport or not.
Conversation Questions
Easy (Recall and Comprehension):
- What is the main topic of the interview between Randall and Emily?
- According to Randall, what are some factors that might make competitive eating controversial?
- How does Emily initially feel about competitive eating as a sport?
- Can you recall any specific examples or analogies used in the interview to describe competitive eating?
- What are some potential elements of training that Randall suggests for competitive eaters?
Intermediate (Analyze and Interpret):
- In what ways does Randall try to justify competitive eating as a sport during the interview?
- How might societal perceptions and stigma influence the classification of competitive eating as a sport, according to Emily?
- Discuss the role of prize money in determining whether an activity qualifies as a sport. Do you agree with this perspective?
- Explore the idea of endurance in competitive eating. How is it different from endurance in traditional sports like running or cycling?
- Why does Emily express the need to know more about competitive eating before forming an opinion? How might additional information influence her perspective?
Advanced (Evaluate and Synthesize):
- Evaluate the arguments presented by Randall regarding the potential sport status of competitive eating. Are they convincing? Why or why not?
- Analyze the societal factors that contribute to the controversy surrounding competitive eating. How do cultural norms and expectations play a role?
- Consider the parallels between competitive eating and other unconventional sports. How do perceptions of what constitutes a sport evolve over time?
- Reflect on the interview’s implications for the broader definition of sports. Should activities like competitive eating be included in the same category as traditional sports? Why or why not?
- If you were to participate in a debate about whether competitive eating is a sport, what key points or arguments would you raise to support your position?